A powerful classic from the '60s, 'The Battle of Algiers,' has stood the test of time and continues to captivate audiences and critics alike. This war film, directed by the talented Gillo Pontecorvo, offers a unique perspective on the Algerian rebellion against French colonial rule. Streaming now on HBO Max, it's a must-watch for any cinephile.
What sets this movie apart is its nuanced portrayal of the Algerian insurgency, offering a sympathetic glimpse into their struggle without ignoring the harsh realities of war. Roger Ebert, the renowned film critic, was a huge fan, awarding it a perfect four-star rating in his 1968 review. He described it as a film that 'exists at a level of bitter reality,' one that might be too intense for some viewers due to its raw honesty.
But here's where it gets controversial: the film's perspective. Ebert initially believed the movie took a balanced stance between the Algerian National Liberation Front (FLN) and the French, but his interpretation evolved over time. In a 2004 piece, he revealed that he now saw the film as more aligned with the FLN's viewpoint.
The film's opening scene, where FLN members assassinate French policemen, is a powerful example of this. The silence that follows these actions, coupled with Ennio Morricone's mournful score when the French retaliate, speaks volumes. It's a stark contrast that highlights the film's sympathies.
And this is the part most people miss: the parallels between 'The Battle of Algiers' and other conflicts. Ebert suggested that the film's universal themes could be applied to various struggles, like the Vietnam War or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It's a thought-provoking idea that adds another layer to the movie's impact.
The French press, however, wasn't as receptive. They delayed the film's release in France until 1971, likely due to the sensitive nature of the subject matter. But even they eventually came around, a testament to the film's enduring power.
'The Battle of Algiers' has inspired many revolutionary films that followed, including Paul Thomas Anderson's 'One Battle After Another.' This film, about a similar revolutionary group known as the French 75, shares some striking similarities with Pontecorvo's masterpiece.
It's a shame that Roger Ebert, who passed away in 2013, never got to see Anderson's take on this dynamic. What would he have thought? We'll never know, but his legacy as a champion of this '60s classic lives on.
So, what's your take? Do you think 'The Battle of Algiers' is a masterpiece, or is it too controversial for comfort? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
